ZombieNationArmy
Stand United. Kneel Divided.
The Department of Homeland Security was founded just after 9/11 as a way to help curb terrorism here on American soil. I wondered when it was founded, why it was needed when the intelligence needed to explain and potentially prevent the attack already existed and went for the most part ignored. To add an agency for this seemed like a knee jerk recation. But our country was all about the knee jerk at the time.
The Department of Homeland Security has in the last year purchased over 2 billion rounds of hollowpoint ammunition. Estimates for this number of rounds suggest an ammo supply that could and would be able to sustain a “hot war” such as Iraq for over two decades. The trick here though is, The Department of Homeland Security is not designed to oversee or police Iraq or any other foreign nation. They are designed to oversee us. We have an active military for international combat and affairds. Those 2 billion + rounds were meant to be fired on American soil. Enough to kill every man woman and child times over. Why?
Many people myself have been asking that very same question for over a year. Most come to the conclusion that they are preparing for something. Martial Law, an emergency event, and orchestrated financial collapse. Just last week, some senators finally started to take notice and began inquiring about the need for such a huge load of ammo. The Department of Homeland Security answered with…..crickets. And then hastily bought up another quarter million rounds. So why are we spending our tax money when our very own government is staying quiet?
I asked someone about the DHS purchases and they almost seemed like they did not want to believe me. They asked for my sources as if to insinuate doubt that I was telling the truth when I had sat here and witnessed this over the last year. But I told them. And they seemed just as disconcerned by the reality of the truth as they did with the fact they were completely unaware of it. As we are all to often able to convince ourselves things are just fine, when in reality hell boils just below our feet.
Now in the wake of mass gun related hysteria and attempts to ban them hoping it will cure the world of violence, those responsible gun owners are finding it harder and harder to find ammunition. I wonder why? Well I know why. If you are not paying attention you may say there is an ammo shortage and assume it is because everyone is buying. Those who are paying attention no better. They know that guns can protect the people from flat out tyranny. They also know that if there are no bullets to be found it doesnt matter.
So when you tuck your kids into bed at night, take solace in knowing somewhere the federal government has a bullet with their name on it. Probably a few to be precise. And when that sends shivers up your spine, just tell yourself “It could not happen here” just as the overwhelming majority of people who fell victim to many murderous regimes probably had said to themselves as well. Look at where it got them. Now those people and those mistakes have been largely forgotten by history. Doomed to be repeated.
Categories: 911 blog-of-the-evil-genius
I came across this article about how the Federal Reserve Bank is planning to start monitoring social media. They will find out who typed the word ‘Fed’, what they said about it, and how they feel about the Fed. The article also states that which we already know. (the D.H.S. constantly monitors everything online.) They mention in the article on pcworld.com that, “Somewhere between Sept. 11 and today, the enemy morphed from a handful of terrorists to the American population at large, leaving us nowhere to run and no place to hide.” Yes, the NSA considers “us” the enemy. Former NSA “voice interceptor” Adrienne Kinne said. To which I reply, when the American population at large has become your biggest concern, maybe it’s time for a little self-reflection. What have you done to piss off 312,351,624 people? Whose crime is greater… The crime of the few towards whom the anger in this country is directed? Or the seemingly inevitable revolution of the masses against their oppressors? There is a looming cloud of anger about to burst in this country. It stems, for the less informed, from the idea that the one percent of the population who has 99 percent of the wealth owes them something. I point to the wall st. protesters currently occupying all parts of this country who feel they’ve been done a misdeed. I assure you, I am not one of them. I, like a growing population of freedom-minded patriots in this country, know that the real reason for the devaluation of our dollar is the federal government. Overspending revenues(money stolen from citizens), our elected officials have abused the system so hard for so long that there is only a very limited number of options for our country to maintain independence. Without getting too much into economics, the government has put our country in incredible debt, as a means of paying off debt, the gov’t borrows money from the fed. The fed creates money out of thin air and proceeds to charge the government interest on the borrowed funds. This, in any other sector of the economy is what we call a SCAM. Constantly creating money and adding to the money supply creates inflation. The more money there is, the less each piece of money is worth. This is yet another way people are having value stolen from them. The reason I support some of the occupiers of wall st., is that some of them know that the fed printed a lot of fake money to give to the large bankster organizations.
Knowing that these people have corrupted a system by regulating it, stolen from our pockets by bailing it out and continuing to operate as if nothing has happened. Well, that sounds to me like a pretty good way of pissing off 312,351,624 people. I still fail to see how the crimes of free thought and speech measure up to the crimes of stealing from312,351,624 every day of their lives. So maybe “we the people” have become the enemy. But to quote Hollywood Undead, “Yes, we wave this flag of hatred, but you’re the ones who made it.”
Categories: 911 ethical-issues financial-oppression politics
On the Eve of the tenth anniversary to the biggest catalyst yet to the fall of our own liberty I thought it appropriate to share good piece of work that focuses on many unanswered and many unknown questions. My friend Robert Vazquez shared this with me. It is written by Bill Haralson for “The Liberty Caller”. Looks like we need to give this American a bigger writing platform. Great work Mr. Haralson.
Was 9/11 Staged?
By Bill Haralson
September 11, 2001 was a day of infamy and tragedy unlike any day our country had witnessed since the attack on Pearl Harbor. The disbelief and surreal experiences by citizens of the United States left our nation paralyzed; our minds impressionable and our attention fixated on the questions of, why and how did this happen? We have seen the footage. We have felt the emotions. The images are imbedded in our memories forever. Do we truly understand the whole story? Did mainstream, corporate media report all the facts? Believe it or not, there are answers to these questions. The answers reveal that 9-11 was an inside job.
Who stood to gain? In order to understand motive, it’s important to analyze the suspects. There are so many suspects it would be impossible to fit them all into this short article. For the scope of this document, we will focus on a small piece of the huge conspirator pie. The first of many red flags begin with Larry Silverstein. Mr. Silverstein is a commercial real estate developer in New York City and is known to have many international ties. He was the leaseholder of World Trade Towers 1, 2, and 7. Mr. Silverstein signed a 99 year lease on towers 1, 2, and 7 in the spring of 2001 with an investment of fifteen million dollars. Two weeks prior to the 9-11 attacks, he took out a 4 billion dollar insurance policy on those buildings. Tower 7 was located three hundred yards away from towers 1 and 2. No other buildings collapsed, other than the buildings Mr. Silverstein had insured. In fact, according to the 9/11 Commission Report, all the buildings collapsed as a result of fire from jet fuel.
Larry Silverstein went on PBS and failed to keep his story straight when he admitted to conceding that WTC Tower 7 should be “pulled” or demolished. What Larry Silverstein stated on PBS and what the 9/11 Commission Report published are two separate accounts. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, WTC towers 1, 2, and 7 collapsed due to jet fuel and fires melting the steel support beams of all three buildings. First, a plane didn’t hit tower 7. Secondly, jet fuel burns at a maximum of 1,796° F. Steel begins to melt at 2,750° F. How could victims be standing at the impact site where the planes crashed, waving their hands for help, yet survive the inferno that would melt steel and cause all three towers to collapse at free fall speed?
Barry Jennings the Emergency Response Coordinator for World Trade 7 was reported by Fox News on the scene of September, 11 2001 as seeing and hearing explosions in building 7. One explosion blew him back into an elevator shaft. Mr. Jennings was subpoenaed to testify in federal court in August of 2008. Two weeks prior to his court appearance, he was found dead in his home. The coroner was ordered not to release the cause of death to the public.
We have been told time and time again that Osama bin Laden is a radical Muslim terrorist who despises freedom. What mainstream media doesn’t reveal is that according to Richard Clarke, who served as an advisor for the Reagan, Bush 41, and Clinton administrations; as well as being the counter-terrorism advisor for President George W. Bush, Al Qaeda was created by the C.I.A. (Central Intelligence Agency) in their offices in Washington, D.C. Let’s take a closer look at the interactions between the C.I.A. and the king pin of terrorism, Osama bin Laden. It has been well publicized that the U.S. had
been warned time and time again by the F.B.I. that Osama Bin Laden’s whereabouts and intentions for an attack involving airliners flying into buildings were tracked and well documented by the United States government. During the Clinton administration, the C.I.A. was ordered by President Clinton to stand down when they had Osama bin Laden in their cross hairs. According to Anthony Sampson of Guardian.co.uk in his article dated November 1, 2001; Osama bin Laden was not only spotted, but met with the C.I.A. when he arrived in Dubai, India from Pakistan on July 4, 2001. Bin Laden was being treated by urologists at an American hospital in Dubai for 10 days. He was visited by a local C.I.A. agent as well as Prince Turki al Faisal, then head of Saudi intelligence. This information was reported by the French newspaper Le Figaro whose sources were part of French intelligence.
If bin Laden was such a “ghost,” why did the White House deliver an order to remove the local C.I.A. agent from his post in Dubai after learning he was boasting to his peers about his secret meeting with the wanted terrorist? Could it be that the entire U.S. intelligence forces were not privy to the covert meetings and plans for what was ahead just two months later and the conspirators wanted to keep it that way?
According to numerous Pentagon declassified documents, Osama bin Laden’s C.I.A. code name was Tim Osman. He had been a C.I.A. asset for nearly 20 years. President Bush Sr. had lunch with Osama bin Laden’s brother on September 10th, 2001.
In fact, the bin Laden family visited the United States the week of 9-11 and were the only people in the nation to be granted clearance to fly on that day after the grounding order was given.
Norman Mineta who was the United States Transportation Secretary gave testimony before the 9/11 Commission as to Dick Cheney’s whereabouts and foreknowledge of the 9-11 attacks. Mr. Mineta testified that he witnessed Dick Cheney issue a stand-down order against firing on the plane headed toward the Pentagon. “Sir the plane is 10 miles out. Does the order still stand?” Cheney: “Of course the order still stands. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” How could this be when the official White House testimony states that Dick Cheney was just as surprised as the rest of America?
President Bush claimed he was at a school and watched the first plane fly into the World Trade Center. News footage revealed that a secret service agent approached the President when he was reading a book to a class of children; which was George W. Bush’s official testimony as to his whereabouts when he first received news.
The challenge with his testimony came when he delivered a speech a few months after the attacks and was asked what went through his mind when he first heard the news. He went on to explain that he watched the “first” plane fly into the World Trade Center and thought: “That must have been a really bad pilot.” How could President Bush forget that he was sitting at a school, reading a book to a classroom of children, when the secret service agent whispered in his ear? This all must be one big coincidence right?
Why does mainstream media fail to report on this news? Let’s look at a statement delivered by David Rockefeller, Chairman of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group; all committees which have Bill
Clinton, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and every other president in the last 95 years as members of these secret organizations:
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.” -David Rockefeller in his address to the Trilateral Commission, June, 1991. David Rockefeller is chairman of nearly all the foreign and domestic policy committees that the United States Presidents were and are members of and he just so happens to be one of the founders of the United Nations!
So if United States Presidents are puppets, then who controls the United States? Let’s look at a quote from President Theodore Roosevelt:
“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owning no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.” Is history repeating itself?
“The easiest way to gain control of the population is to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened.” –Joseph Stalin
By studying history (outside of what is taught in the socialized school system) we find that government staged terrorism has been common practice since the Roman Empire. After analyzing the crime, it is clear that 9-11 was one of many staged events, designed to control the populace and usher in world government.
“We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”-Paul Warburg Council on Foreign Relations and architect of the Federal Reserve System; in an address to the United States Senate on February 17, 1950.
References
9-11 Commission Report (2004). W.W. Norton & Company Publishing
Corsi, J. (2007). The Late Great USA World Ahead Media Publishing
C-Span (2003) Norm Mineta 9/11 Commission Testimony
Retrieved January 6, 2009 from Research Web site:
Estulin, D. (2007). The True Story Of The Bilderberg Group
Trine Day Publishing
Jones, A. (2007) Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement
Retrieved December 22, 2008, from Research Web site: http://www.infowars.com
Rockefeller, D. (2002). David Rockefeller Memoirs Random House Publishing
Sampson, A. (2001) Bin Laden visited by CIA
Retrieved December 22, 2008 from Research Web site:
http://www.guardian.co.uk
The official conclusion regarding the attacks of 911 still maintain that radical Muslims are to blame for the events that occurred that day. Considering the size and scope of the 911 attacks, one can assume that deliberate and long-term planning was needed in order to execute such events. In my opinion, a person would almost certainly need a very good reason in order to go to such a great extent to orchestrate such a complicated task. What was their reason for doing this? Well, according to George W. Bush, they spent years planning the event because they hate our freedoms. Call me crazy, but in my opinion having freedom is hardly a sufficient reason for wanting to plan major attacks on the U.S. homeland. Yet this is the reason given to us by our own President shortly after the attacks. Below is a video of President George W. Bush addressing the nation just after the events of September 11th. If you start the video at 1:20, you will hear Bush telling the country why the alleged perpetrators attacked our homeland.
Indeed we were told that our freedoms made us an object of hatred. Could this really be the only reason, or even a reason at all? I’m not sure about you, but when I was a kid, if I did something wrong or misbehaved, I remember almost always being asked why I did it. I recall slamming my younger brother in the face with a toy guitar when I was about 10 years old. After he went crying to my mother, she asked me why in the hell I would do such a thing. I was then free to give my best attempt at explaining myself. The point here is that we as a country didn’t take the time to ask the alleged perpetrators why they committed these acts. Instead, we jumped straight to the conclusion of “they attacked us because we have freedom, and they hate freedom.” Below is a video that shows Osama bin Laden talking about the September 11th attacks. If you read the subtitles carefully, you will realize that he was of the opinion that the U.S. was attacked for reasons that run much deeper than the possession of freedom. Notice that bin Laden does not admit his own involvement in this video.
How would you have reacted if George W. Bush told us that we were attacked because a group of militant middle-easterners were fed up with us getting involved in their affairs halfway around the world? I am guessing you might have reacted a little differently than when you were told that they attacked us for our freedoms. How would we react if China continuously bombed us and our neighboring countries? How would we react if China set up permanent military bases on our homeland? Personally, I would want to retaliate against China in much the same way we were retaliated against. It makes sense to me that you can only poke a bull with a stick for so long before it charges you in revenge. I think the latter explanation is more likely to produce reactions of anger and hatred. These are the emotions a government would want their people to have towards groups that they are about to engage in war. This helps ensure public support for military operations before any questions are asked. Further, had our government told us we were attacked as a result of our foreign policy, then it would seem counterproductive to keep starting new wars in the Muslim world—which is exactly what has been occurring in the past 10 years.
Congressman Ron Paul from Texas frequently talks about the idea of “blowback.” Essentially, blowback refers to the negative consequences that arise when we as a country meddle in the business of other nations. If you believe that Muslims attacked us on 911, then it is more likely because of blowback than our freedoms. The below video shows Congressman Paul educating the audience, as well as the other candidates, about the effects of blowback. Does this make sense to you?
Categories: 911
How did you feel when you heard President Obama announce the death of Osama bin Laden? It’s quite possible that you were overcome with a sense of joy and relief. Many Americans celebrated the death of bin Laden following the president’s announcement. This is certainly understandable considering that bin Laden has been vilified to the highest degree for the past 10 years. This has been done via all avenues of the mainstream media. It was no more than 24 hours after the collapse of the twin towers that we were told, via the mainstream media, that bin Laden was the mastermind behind the awful events. The media had convicted bin Laden before any type of formal investigation had taken place. Thus begins the campaign to paint the picture of the “most dangerous man on Earth.”
Americans were pissed off, and they needed somewhere to dump their anger. It was easy to hate bin Laden considering the mood of the country at the time. Rarely was bin Laden’s involvement in 911 ever questioned in the mainstream media. The few instances that I personally observed people questioning his guilt, the questioners were immediately chastised for their comments and made to look crazy. The following video illustrates one example of how this happens.
Notice how Bill O’reilly continuously talks down to the guest who is merely trying to state his well studied opinion. It can be said that Bill O’reilly is a conservative television commentator. However, commentators on both sides of the political spectrum ridicule those who question the government’s official story. Here is a clip of Bill Mahr doing much the same thing:
I think this makes others who have legitimate questions less likely to speak out in fear of being labeled a “loon ball.”
So, from day one we were told that bin Laden was behind the attacks of 911. The mainstream media upheld this idea while silencing and vilifying all dissenters. Thus the idea of bin Laden being the most evil man on Earth has been pounded into our brains for the past 10 years. Therefore I think it’s natural for many Americans to feel compelled to celebrate the news that he had been killed. Regardless of whether or not American forces actually killed bin Laden, which is a whole other topic, we have to ask ourselves some serious questions. Why was the 911 attacks never listed as one of bin Laden’s offenses on the FBI’s own website? How could our government have known with seemingly 100 percent certainty just hours after the attacks that bin Laden was the perpetrator? Why are common Americans being vilified for questioning the official 911 story? Why do those who question the official story have no voice in the mainstream media? Why do 6 out of 10 of the investigators of the 911 commission call for a new investigation? Last but certainly not least: why was bin Laden not worthy of being given a chance to prove his innocence in court?
If the government has all this proof that he did it, then why not prove it in court? It should be a cakewalk considering all of the supposed evidence that exists. This is America: A country that believes in due process—innocent until proven guilty. Did we not have an obligation to prove bin Laden’s guilt? Or do we blindly accept the government’s words as the truth? Considering all of this, was the news of his death truly a good cause for celebration?